If it turns out that it doesn't kill fish, it could be used in a lot of temporary applications. the one thing that has always irked me is people getting in pissing contests when neither one knows the actual facts. this experiment isn't for them, I'm doing it for my own quest for true knowledge, in spite of them. I also know that if the fish dies, they'll do a little happy dance, high five each other and say, 'I told you so'.
they'll come up with all kinds of reasons why I didn't prove anything. I realize that even if two years from now the fish is still alive and all seems well, that the naysayers will still say, 'it doesn't prove a thing'. I will either prove or disprove the theory that blackjack kills fish. I'd suggest to anyone that wants to hate on my experiment to either wait until all is said and done to voice your criticisms or state something other than an 'opinion' At the end of this, The goldfish may not live, but I will have a small water garden and enough Blackjack to put on my storage shed.
